Skip Navigation

Journal of Human Rights Practice 2009 1(3):488-498; doi:10.1093/jhuman/hup020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

This article appears in the following Journal of Human Rights Practice issue: Special Issue: Where Is The Evidence? [View the issue table of contents]

Evaluation at Minority Rights Group

Claire Thomas

Minority Rights Group, 54 Commercial Street, London E1 6LT, UK

claire.thomas{at}mrgmail.org


  Abstract

This practice note sets out some of the thinking behind evaluation at Minority Rights Group (MRG) and looks at our current practice in this area. It considers how MRG has changed in terms of evaluation in recent years. It discusses what we have learnt about evaluation, and the current major challenges that we face in this aspect of our work.

Keywords: attribution, intervention logic, outcome mapping, theory of change, time frames, triangulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.